Two years ago, in an article for Deloitte, I explored the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in planning & forecasting. It was the early days of Generative AI, and my approach was to be cautious amid considerable hype.
What did I get wrong, and what did I get right?
Looking back, I was too conservative. Today, I would say we are entering a new era for forecasting and planning.

A collection of interesting forecasting & planning tools
My initial article predicted three ways LLMs would support better forecasting and planning:

Notably absent was the idea of LLMs directly producing forecasts. At the time, I aimed to dispel a common misconception that went something like this:
“Previously we’ve used “AI” for forecasting, now this new, better “AI” will make even better forecasts.” - a common misunderstanding in the early days of Generative AI
The reality has proven more nuanced. LLMs are now being used directly for forecasting through innovative approaches like those from Chronulus AI. Furthermore, LLMs have spurred the development of foundation models for forecasting—pretrained models built with a similar approach and architectures.
Forecasting Copilots:
Two years ago, general models like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot weren't great at writing forecasting code. I predicted the emergence of forecasting-specific copilots.
Since then, some of the issues I faced with general models have been mitigated by tools that make it easier to inject online documentation into your context.
Perhaps more interesting though, specialized tools for data science and forecasting have emerged. Traversaal and Julius are two interesting examples:

Screenshot from the Traversaal website

Screenshot from the Julias website